NCERT SOLUTIONS: NATIONASLISM IN INDIA
Write in Brief
1. Explain:
(a) Why growth of nationalism in the colonies is linked to an anti-colonial movement.
(b) How the First World War helped in the growth of the National Movement in India.
(c) Why Indians were outraged by the Rowlatt Act.
(d) Why Gandhiji decided to withdraw the Non-Cooperation Movement.
(a) Why growth of nationalism in the colonies is linked to an anti-colonial movement.
(b) How the First World War helped in the growth of the National Movement in India.
(c) Why Indians were outraged by the Rowlatt Act.
(d) Why Gandhiji decided to withdraw the Non-Cooperation Movement.
Answer
(a)
Colonisation affected people’s freedom, and nationalist sentiments surged
during the process of struggle against imperial domination. The sense of
oppression and exploitation became a common bond for people from different
walks of life, and this resulted in the growth of nationalist ideals. Thus,
growth of nationalism in the colonies is linked to anti-colonial movements.
(b) During
the First World War, the British army conducted forced recruitment from rural
areas in India. To finance the defence expenditure, high custom duties and
income taxes were imposed. Also, during 1918-19 and 1920-21, crops failed in
many parts of India, thereby resulting in acute food shortages. All this caused
extensive anger and opposition against the British colonial rule, and the
national movement of India headed towards a stronger, more definitive
direction.
(c) The
Rowlatt Act was passed hurriedly through the Imperial Legislative Council
despite opposition from Indian members. It gave the government autocratic
powers to repress political activities besides allowing it to detain political
prisoners without a trial, for two years. The Indian were outraged by this act
as it was clearly undemocratic and oppressive, and hurt national sentiments and
dignity.
(d) Gandhiji
decided to withdraw the Non-Cooperation Movement due to various incidents of
violence perpetrated by the masses, especially the Chauri Chaura incident in
1922 where the people clashed with the police, setting a police-station on
fire. Gandhiji felt that the people were not yet ready for a mass struggle, and
that satyagrahis needed to be properly trained for non-violent demonstrations.
2. What is meant by the idea Satyagraha?
Answer
Satyagraha
was a novel method of mass agitation. The idea of Satyagraha emphasized upon
the power of truth and the need to search for truth. It suggested that if the
cause was true and if the struggle was against injustice, then physical force
was not necessary to fight the oppressor.
Through non-violent methods a Satyagraha could appeal the conscience of the oppressor by the power of truth, which was bound to win.
Through non-violent methods a Satyagraha could appeal the conscience of the oppressor by the power of truth, which was bound to win.
3. Write a newspaper report on:
(a) The Jallianwala Bagh massacre
(b) The Simon Commission
(a) The Jallianwala Bagh massacre
(b) The Simon Commission
Answer
a) On
13th April 1919, a large crowd gathered in the enclosed ground of Jallianwala
Bagh – some to protest against the British government’s repressive measures,
others to attend the annual Baishakhi Fair. These people were unaware of the
imposition of Marshal Law in the city. General Dyer, the Commander, blocked the
exit points from the Bagh and opened fire upon the innocent citizens. Dyer’s
intention was to produce a ‘moral effect’ and terrorize satyagrahis. Hundreds
of innocent people including women and children were killed and wounded due to
this indiscriminate firing by the British soldiers, which ultimately led to
nation-wide outrage. Jallianwala Bagh incident was the most brutal incident in
the History of India.
b) The
Simon Commission was constituted by the Tory Government in Britain, under Sir
John Simon. The objective of the Commission was to look into the functioning of
the constitutional system in India and suggest some constitutional changes. But
nationalists in India opposed the Commission because it had not a single Indian
member. Therefore, when the Simon Commission arrived in India in 1928, it was
greeted with the slogan “Go Back Simon”. All parties, including Congress and
the Muslim league, participated in the demonstrations.
4. Compare the images of Bharat Mata in this chapter with the
image of Germania in Chapter 1.
Answer
→ The
image of Germania was the symbol of German nation whereas; the image of Bharat
Mata was the symbol of Indian nation.
→ Both images inspired nationalists who worked very hard to unify their respective countries and to attain a liberal nation.
→ The image of Bharat Mata is different from that of Germania in the sense that former reflects the religious basis of its making.
→ The image of Bharat Mata painted by Abanindranath Tagore is bestowed with learning, food, clothing and some ascetic quality also. Another painting of Bharat Mata in which we find Mata holding Trishul and standing beside a lion and an elephant – symbols of power and authority. This image appears to be more akin to the image of Germania where she holds a sword and a shield.
→ Both images inspired nationalists who worked very hard to unify their respective countries and to attain a liberal nation.
→ The image of Bharat Mata is different from that of Germania in the sense that former reflects the religious basis of its making.
→ The image of Bharat Mata painted by Abanindranath Tagore is bestowed with learning, food, clothing and some ascetic quality also. Another painting of Bharat Mata in which we find Mata holding Trishul and standing beside a lion and an elephant – symbols of power and authority. This image appears to be more akin to the image of Germania where she holds a sword and a shield.
Discuss
1. List all the different social groups which joined the
Non-Cooperation Movement of 1921. Then choose any three and write about their
hopes and struggles to show why they joined the movement.
Answer
The
different social groups that joined the Non-Cooperation Movement of 1921 were
the urban middle class comprising lawyers, teachers and headmasters, students,
peasants, tribals and workers.
→ The
middle class joined the movement because the boycott of foreign goods would
make the sale of their textiles and handlooms go up.
→ The peasants took part in the movement because they hoped they would be saved from the oppressive landlords, high taxes taken by the colonial government.
→ Plantation workers took part in the agitation hoping they would get the right to move freely in and outside the plantations and get land in their own villages.
→ The peasants took part in the movement because they hoped they would be saved from the oppressive landlords, high taxes taken by the colonial government.
→ Plantation workers took part in the agitation hoping they would get the right to move freely in and outside the plantations and get land in their own villages.
2. Discuss the Salt March to make clear why it was an effective
symbol of resistance against colonialism.
Answer
The
Salt March was an effective symbol of resistance against colonialism because it
was done in revolt against a commodity- salt, used by the rich and the poor
alike. The tax on salt, and the government monopoly over its production was a
severely oppressive administrative move. The Salt March was effective also
because Gandhiji met a large number of commoners during the march and he taught
them the true meaning of swaraj and non-violence. By peacefully defying a law
and making salt against government orders, Gandhiji set forth an example to the
whole nation of how the oppressor could be confronted in a non-violent manner.
This also led to the Civil Disobedience Movement in 1930.
4. Why did political leaders differ sharply over the question
of separate electorates?
Answer
Political
leaders differed sharply over the question of separate electorates because of
differences in opinion. While those supporting the cause of minorities and the
dalits believed that only political empowerment would resolve their social backwardness,
others like Gandhiji thought that separate electorates would further slow down
the process of their integration into society. Also, it was feared that the
system of separate electorates would gradually divide the country into numerous
fragments because every community or class would then ask for separate
representations.
it was helpful
ReplyDeletethank you for your feedback
Delete